IFRS · HGB Auf Deutsch
IAS 19 High divergence

Employee Benefits / Pension Provisions

Treatment under IFRS

Defined benefit pension plans are measured using the projected unit credit method. Actuarial gains and losses are recognised directly in other comprehensive income (OCI).

  • Projected unit credit method: future salary increases and staff turnover must be taken into account.
  • Discount rate: the market yield on high-quality corporate bonds.
  • Actuarial gains and losses (remeasurements): recognised in OCI, outside profit or loss.
  • Service cost and net interest cost are recognised in profit or loss.
  • Plan assets must be offset against the obligation.

Treatment under German GAAP (HGB)

§ 249 HGB§ 253 HGB§ 266 HGB

Pension provisions are measured under § 253 HGB using the average market interest rate of the past 10 years. There is no OCI; all changes go through profit or loss.

  • § 249 (1) HGB: a provision must be recognised.
  • § 253 (2) HGB: discounting at the average market rate of the past 10 financial years (for pension obligations), published by the Deutsche Bundesbank.
  • § 266 (3) HGB: provisions are presented on the equity-and-liabilities side of the balance sheet.
  • Measurement is usually based on actuarial methods (e.g. the projected unit credit method).

Key differences

  • Discount rate: HGB uses a 10-year average vs. IFRS the current market rate – sometimes leading to material measurement differences.
  • German GAAP has no OCI; all actuarial effects go through profit or loss.
  • The transition difference from first-time BilMoG application may be built up over up to 15 years (Art. 67 EGHGB).
  • Offsetting against plan assets is permitted under HGB only on the narrow conditions of § 246 (2) sentence 2 HGB.

Example

Example – a pension payment of €1,000,000 due in 15 years: at the current IFRS market rate (assumed 3.5%) the present value of the obligation is ≈ €596,891; at the HGB 10-year average rate (assumed 1.8%) ≈ €765,218. IFRS recognises actuarial effects in OCI, whereas HGB recognises them fully in profit or loss.

Worked example

Assumptions (highly simplified): A vested, unfunded pension promise pays a single sum of €1,000,000 in 15 years. For illustration the obligation is calculated as the present value of this single payment (a real obligation – the DBO – is determined using the projected-unit-credit method with salary, turnover and mortality assumptions). IFRS – current market rate on high-quality corporate bonds, assumed here 3.5% (IAS 19.83). HGB – average market rate of the last 10 years (§ 253 (2) HGB), assumed here 1.8%. Which obligation is higher depends on the interest-rate environment. All amounts in euros, rounded.

Step 1 – Discount rate and size of the obligation

Present value = €1,000,000 ÷ (1 + rate)15. A lower rate produces a higher obligation.

SystemDiscount ratePresent value of obligation
IFRS (current market rate)3.5%596,891
HGB (10-year average)1.8%765,218
Difference168,327

Step 2 – Interest-rate sensitivity

The measurement is highly sensitive to the discount rate – the key driver of the valuation difference between IFRS and HGB.

Discount ratePresent value of obligation
1.8%765,218
2.5%690,466
3.5%596,891

Step 3 – Recognition of changes (OCI vs P&L)

ItemIFRSHGB
Current service costP&LP&L
Unwinding of the discount (interest)P&LP&L (§ 277 (5) HGB)
Actuarial gains/losses (remeasurements)OCIP&L
Effect of a change in the discount rateOCIP&L
Offset against plan assetsmandatoryonly § 246 (2) HGB (narrow)

Step 4 – Journal entries (illustrative, one year)

IFRS – unwinding of the discount (net interest = €596,891 × 3.5%) and an actuarial loss (illustrative €30,000) recognised in OCI:

AccountDebitCredit
Interest expense (P&L)20,891
Pension provision20,891
Other comprehensive income (remeasurement)30,000
Pension provision30,000

HGB – unwinding of the discount (€765,218 × 1.8%) and the same effect entirely through profit or loss:

AccountDebitCredit
Interest expense (P&L)13,774
Pension provision13,774
Other expense (P&L, rate effect)30,000
Pension provision30,000

Current service cost affects profit or loss under both systems and is not quantified here.

Key takeaway

Two levers drive the differences: (1) the discount rate – IFRS uses the current market rate, HGB a 10-year average – producing different obligation amounts; (2) the recognition of actuarial effects – IFRS in OCI, HGB fully in profit or loss. As a result HGB profit is more volatile to changes in rates and assumptions, whereas IFRS keeps such fluctuations out of the period result. Note: the difference between the 10-year and 7-year average measurement is subject to a distribution block under § 253 (6) HGB.

Related standards