IFRS · HGB Auf Deutsch
IAS 38 High divergence

Intangible Assets

Treatment under IFRS

Selbst erstellte immaterielle Vermögenswerte in der Entwicklungsphase sind zwingend zu aktivieren, wenn bestimmte Kriterien erfüllt sind. Forschungsausgaben werden sofort aufwandswirksam erfasst.

  • Aktivierungspflicht in der Entwicklungsphase bei Erfüllung der 6 Kriterien (IAS 38.57).
  • Goodwill aus Unternehmenszusammenschlüssen: Aktivierung, kein planmäßiger Abschreibungszeitraum (nur Impairment Test nach IAS 36).
  • Wahlrecht Neubewertungsmodell für immaterielle Vermögenswerte mit aktivem Markt (selten anwendbar).
  • Umfangreiche Angabepflichten nach Art der immateriellen Vermögenswerte.

Treatment under German GAAP (HGB)

§ 248 HGB§ 253 HGB§ 255 HGB

Selbst erstellte immaterielle Anlagewerte dürfen nach HGB aktiviert werden (Wahlrecht seit BilMoG 2009), ausgenommen originärer Firmenwert. Derivativer Geschäftswert muss aktiviert werden.

  • § 248 Abs. 2 HGB: Aktivierungswahlrecht für selbst erstellte immaterielle Anlagewerte.
  • § 255 Abs. 4 HGB: Derivativer Firmenwert ist Aktivierungspflicht, planmäßige Abschreibung über die Nutzungsdauer.
  • § 253 Abs. 1 HGB: AHK-Obergrenze; kein Neubewertungsmodell.

Key differences

  • Kein Aktivierungsgebot in der Entwicklungsphase – nur Wahlrecht nach § 248 Abs. 2 HGB.
  • Originärer (selbst geschaffener) Firmenwert darf nach HGB nicht aktiviert werden.
  • Derivativer Firmenwert: HGB schreibt planmäßige Abschreibung vor; IFRS nur Impairment Test (kein planmäßiger Abschreibungszeitraum).
  • Ausschüttungssperre für aktivierte selbst geschaffene immaterielle Vermögensgegenstände nach § 268 Abs. 8 HGB.

Example

Example – €600,000 of development costs for a new product (capitalisation criteria met), useful life 5 years: IFRS must capitalise and amortise over 5 years (€120,000/year from Year 2). Under HGB this is an option (§ 248 (2) HGB); if the company does not elect it, the €600,000 is expensed immediately.

Worked example

Assumptions: A company develops a new product in Year 1. Development expenditure €600,000; the capitalisation criteria of IAS 38.57 are met from the start of the development phase. Useful life 5 years, straight-line amortisation from Year 2 (once available for use). Research costs are expensed immediately under both systems and are excluded here. IFRS: capitalisation is mandatory. HGB: in this example the company does not exercise the option in § 248 (2) HGB and expenses the development costs immediately (a common, prudence-driven choice). All amounts in euros.

Step 1 – Classification: research vs development

  • Research phase: expenditure is expensed immediately under both systems (IAS 38.54; HGB prohibits capitalisation).
  • Development phase: IFRS – mandatory capitalisation once the six criteria are met (IAS 38.57). HGB – capitalisation option (§ 248 (2) HGB).

Step 2 – Income-statement effect (expense per year)

Under IFRS the expense is spread over the useful life (amortisation from Year 2); under HGB (option not elected) it falls entirely in Year 1.

YearIFRS expenseHGB expenseDifference (IFRS − HGB)
10600,000−600,000
2120,0000+120,000
3120,0000+120,000
4120,0000+120,000
5120,0000+120,000
6120,0000+120,000
Σ600,000600,0000

Step 3 – Balance-sheet effect (carrying amount of the intangible asset)

The cumulative profit difference from Step 2 equals, in every year, exactly the carrying amount capitalised under IFRS.

Year-endIFRS intangibleHGBDifference
1600,0000600,000
2480,0000480,000
3360,0000360,000
4240,0000240,000
5120,0000120,000
6000

Step 4 – Journal entries

IFRS – Year 1 (capitalise development costs):

AccountDebitCredit
Intangible assets (development)600,000
Bank / sundry600,000

IFRS – Year 2 (amortisation):

AccountDebitCredit
Amortisation expense120,000
Intangible assets120,000

HGB – Year 1 (option not elected → immediate expense):

AccountDebitCredit
Expense (development)600,000
Bank / sundry600,000

Step 5 – HGB option and goodwill (note)

  • Option: if the company capitalises under § 248 (2) HGB, the picture resembles IFRS (spread amortisation); a distribution block then applies (§ 268 (8) HGB).
  • Prohibition: internally generated goodwill as well as internally generated brands, mastheads and customer lists may not be capitalised under § 248 (2) sentence 2 HGB.
  • Acquired goodwill: HGB requires systematic amortisation (§ 255 (4) HGB); IFRS only an annual impairment test with no scheduled amortisation (see IFRS 3 for details).

Key takeaway

IFRS requires development costs to be capitalised and spreads the expense over the useful life; HGB makes capitalisation an option. If the option is not elected (a common, prudent practice), the entire amount is expensed immediately – lower initial profit but higher subsequent profit. The total expense is identical in both systems (€600,000); the cumulative profit difference equals, in every year, exactly the carrying amount capitalised under IFRS.

Related standards